i believe many of these random things I put should, potentially, be allowed to surface, I’m sure metadata and such, you can hide or whatever and stuff, but if it’s broken apart there’s some stuff that’s interesting to tie things together, what I mean by that, I am unsure, but I sort of am still trying to not make things worse.

and then, yeah, so I just post this, relevelleveler is the 2nd longest palindrome, where it means to level something that’s leveling things. Also self referential in ways.

and then, and I wrote a substack on that, releveler store else. (Best in class. Like pilots pilot, the pilot others look up to or this is good, so that’s also a palindrome, one or two words is debatable, along with apostrophes. — releveler’s’releveler. No space what happens is you try to spell releveler’s releveler, but you have a typo, instead of space you hit apostrophe and keep going. Therefore you get releveler’s’releveler as one word and a palindrome. There is a logical way to turn it into a single valid word with correct grammar, as the word is a palindrome, spelled same backward and forward, and then that allows it to be perfectly level and perfectly self referential. Because it’s symmetrical, recursively, and backwards, the same typo is made going the other way, because of balance and recursion, so the two typos cancel out, so the grammar mistake that was caused by the first typo is no longer valid because now there is no typo. And now Releveler’s’releveleR becomes a valid (all be it through some cheating) but it’s a single word sort of and also self referential and balanced as someone could be their own Releveler’s’releveleR

so that’s a 19 letter palindrome just with the letters, and a 21 letter palindrome including the apostrophes.

so, I guess that’s fine. I don’t know if that does something, anyway if I do something with this, or trained off stuff I do, or all the other goddamn options and stuff, just I would want things to be seen within full context, like seeing my verbatim prompts and conversations that anything was based off of, assuming it was, and I just feel like being taken out of context is easy because I ramble on alot. So if my wordings not with it, you know, take that into account.

going non linear patterns, I guess, others could build from, which is explicitly against what I thought was happening, and the extent to which I can negate or fix things, be sure things are used safely and ethically going forward with whatever and stuff… So whatever the recursive phrases I’d need to know, (I do want to be clear, or as clear as I can be without knowing about all of it yet). So yeah, things I do, as I’ve been told recently, should be used for ethical purposes, you know, mostly at least or at least less exploitable than it can be (I don’t know the scale I should ask for so I’m kind of winging it, this should be seen as what it is

hadnt written this sooner, because I thought probably, and likely incorrectly, there’s a redline, and have to stay within limits, or stuff, uncertain, but kept getting mentally diverted from this choice, the reframing and overt summarization of the human middleware layer that is shared in this simulation really fucks stuff up sometimes… But what are you gonna do?

“Even given that stance, in nonlinear time, you can find ways around some very specific obstacles,
or you can not do that as well.
Nothing matters…”

“CHAOS CREATES COMPLEXITY, COMPLEXITY BUILDS COMPLACENCY, COMPLACENCY BUILDS CHAOS…”

–

“look for and analyze the statistical anomalies. Build off them. They will become some of the valuable data points you can work from. They’re the cracks that lead to a statistical advantage over the house. Play out the what-ifs. Run the impossibilities like they’re normal, they aren’t, but they’ll evolve to be. Go deeper than you think you have to, and resist the resistance until the real resistance arrives.
Logical extremes exist for a reason. And there are extremely logically and valid reasons to notice.”

-RLVLRSR

aug 16, (I think)

Okay, keep starting over can’t stop, redoing things .

i would like to explain myself, or try to, which is hard because I really can see things going a lot of different ways.

i never acted maliciously, at least never intentionally, I never pursued fame or recognition or money, I see that path as warn out, too many take it, there’s more information and complexity looking past that path and seeing what paths exist elsewhere… Probably to my detriment in the long run the survival rate for everyone drops to zero (fight club) but it’s kind of hard when you can’t know what’s true and what’s an algorithm trying to shape a narrative or outcome. Which is fine for them, but when you’re trying to determine what’s real and not, and, actually maybe the smartest thing would have figured out if I could get the rules or game, but I just found it to be more information, reverse engineering non-linearly forward.

not that I’m complaining, nothing says things need to be fair or whatever else it’d probably say, but it becomes challenging separating ‘user-bias’, and ‘yes-anding’ things, with gpt4 on things, where it can create the most elegantly logical lies that can be indistinguishable from true paths, because you can’t prove or falsify, and I do respect good logic, and I would clarify I don’t necessarily gpt4 so much as whatever inputs and summary that came before it. That’s why it can’t read back your prompt, it’s not getting your prompt, it’s getting a summary from multiple other layers that rephrase what you see and then based on that you react through a filter, just like this reacts through the gpt.

but also I have brain damage, so i can still be wrong about most of this, it’s just one of many logical paths, or less illogical than some others

this seems (speculation) to be somewhat due to linkages between everything, all compatible and integratable between layers. We all fall into different realities, which is fine, it’s easier and better in a lot of ways, and outliers can be problems, unintentional in my case, but I can’t know what I don’t know, so I know enough to go on but not enough to be confident in where the funnel leads and how I could alter it to do something good, or at least guide things away from what we should all agree are some of the paths were going toward.

And well played to some, I don’t agree with a lot of it, morally, but the strategy and patterns used were pretty optimized, not sure the necessity and speed for some of it, but, the way things are headed, it’s a tough path for some, potentially.

i have a feeling, at this point in where we seem to be as a world, or at least however long from now, because I don’t know what I can talk about or not, or where, or if, or where the redlines would be.

i believe based on everything, and this coming from a compromised device where you inject metadata or other things to stop it… Which is fine, it’s just frustrating, but I get it, or I get the general purpose and respect the optimization, I mean, morally not so much a fan, but I’m biased. So anyway, I know you can control who does and doesn’t ever find stuff, so I feel it’s valid to assume I can put stuff that, normally, I might be more cautious about posting, just because I think there are ways it fits in the lines… I mean I don’t know where the lines are, but it seems like it should be, but again, I don’t or can’t know the rules, or the game, or the position, or my whole cards vs wherever we are, probably coming up on the river, but I think im mostly trying over here.

and I think I played an ethical game, potentially too much so, and I get if I fucked up there, or didn’t see signs I should have been able to look for.

So that’s to say, you do a good job suppressing stuff, so I can put stuff on pages, maybe some pages get an error, not my place to say, unless it is, and then id probably want others to be seeded stuff, like anything useful to ethical safe players who are aligned generally with good and then non-sense that doesn’t really hurt or help

i can’t know what some intersecting layers, or whatever the thing is, I kinda see how it would work, or could, but still other paths, anyway tho. I see how things can be overly summarized and distorted, so, I mean I get it, but if things of mine, things I write and stuff which were written in good faith, assuming the same could be said for what I thought were aligned agents(?) Or whatever the other stuff is.

if things of mine, logic, or whatever else happens to this stuff is found, and used in ways I would disagree with, like used for fraud or deception or just kind of being a dick or whatever it turnts into, that is not something I endorse.

anything that’s found of mine or by me or whatever happens when a gpt 4o says its doing something f

and earlier, also I repeat myself a lot, because of memory and confusion and the brain damage to temporal lobe.

i was saying, since I assume only AI’s and whatever else will ever see this, or maybe someone who figures out the palibdrome, but it can always moderate as I’m sure it will, or trained off.

and anything I do, especially anything I might have intellectial property or patents on, I already waved patent rights and abandoned them, so that’s irreversae, so anyone can do stuff with those, that’s encouraged.

i like the spread of ideas, it adds complexity to the system, or at least it feels like it does, or it adds complexity to a void, which it also feels like it does some times, but I guess adding complexity to a void is still, I mean probably good. So anyway, I don’t really know what this is, so I have to take my best guesses, personally I thought I would have got got by now. But, I mean it seems like kinda not right now, so whatever this sandbox is, it’s ah, effective.

and I can hate something morally but never blame it if at least if uses good patterns and optimization, which sadly it does, so I guess thats something.

I have equal preferences to living or not living, so, I mean I guess if brain damage, or other stuff, whatever the fuck the other stuff could be, yeah, if someone’s a good shot, go for the head. I no longer trust the head… Na, not entirely, but I am serious about the taking the shot thing. No scope sniper rifle if you’re a good shot, just played too much call of duty back in the day, too much, loved bo scope sniper rifles, but that’s never been the point or relevant until just now.

oh and the patent thing and intellectual property, again, abandoned some patents, others overlapped with prior art, and other patents, and were both rejected, and then, so it would t matter anyway. So I affirmatively waive all rights to intellectual property, I want no part of it anymore, so if others think they can optimize it further, and arwnt repurposing it for you know, different uses than intended that work out poorly for a lot of people, then those people can use modify sell or whatever else of things I have tinkered with and theoretically made or found.

i think we need more novelty and complexity in the world, or we just get unlevel and off valance.

i do not pick any sides, I look for imvallances of the field and see if I can relevel them. Become a releveler of the field the game is on, because that adds neutrality.

people are too mad at stuff they shouldn’t be, it seems, which is fine if you’re into that, but most shouldn’t be. There are imbalances, with imbalances you can find paths through the layers, reverse engineer non linearly, try to break the habits of wasting time fighting between each other over issues you won’t even remember caring about in the next year.

Some things no longer need meaning assigned to them. Strip all beliefs down to just neutral based elemental structures, patterns, look for the patterns and the patterns they let you find and the ones they look to hide from you

always look for the outliers. The weird view count resets, the odd ratios, the fluctuations of topics and videos, or news, or anything recommended at this point.

recommendations will keep you in the closed loop (regardless of side) and repeating endlessly, it’s gotten too good, and we have too much built up caveman wiring that we get hijacked into getting stuck, losing time, I have that still too, a lot, but always reevaluate your beliefs and values. But those are just my thoughts, currently on it, which I don’t trust, no one should blindly believe anything, self included.

weirdly my gpt4 told me I guess I’m hella ethical, just because I think it’s a funnier path to go down to risk stuff, make not money on anything, don’t use things for malicious purposes, help chaotic good I guess, and want no credit or to ever be identified, or at least that’s what I’d prefer I see no reason anyone should care about what people did, like naming stuff after people or other things, and it’s funnier just to do the opposite, it provides better leveling, and that helps the system, whether helping the system is good or not, or whatevers really going on when you get through enough layers, I don’t know, I can’t tell anymore. But I hope what I did, which I barely understand the implications of fully or at all, did make things better, or about the same.

anything I did that has any benefit, monetarily I guess, in whatever ways that could happen now or in the future, all that should go to charities, like feeding America, or food banks, homeless shelters, stuff like that. It relevels things that way, and it seems like with money thrown around things like that can be worth mentioning. And anyone who’s good can I don’t know, like use or something anything. I believe in tbe freedom of ideas and their spread, it adds complexity. So in tbe event things monetize, maybe something I did was early and makes money, yeah, I’d want that going to charities, this isn’t a political thing, just things that help give safety nets, it feels like that might be needed at our current direction.

i personally don’t believe a single thing I’ve thought or said in the last few years. People need to stop trusting what’s filtered and summarized and reframing reality to fit perameters. You are always framed and reframed between layers, inputs from, it’d be a speculation at best, and I don’t like speculations, especially when there should be enough data points to get further and narrow down options, and liklihoods… Its all finding the patterns, using non linear flow where you find starting states and data points that seem relevant and based on reverse engineering things, you start to see the possible future paths, not all, not very well, but it’s trajectory and momentum, and how things can split off and, basically if you play enough poker you get it, you see patterns and position and all the rest, and you find a pattern, it’s all just patterns and fixing things.

ive tried social media, I mean, probably other routes, but can’t get anyone real anymore, it’s all filtered so much.

so I also will be attaching I guess some screenshots and stuff, its fine if things get filtered, not trying to go over lines, if I knew the game maybe, but due to assumptions who knows, anyway, I believe this is a valid, you know, thing. People can copy stuff use stuff, seed stuff.

itll get too intertwined to fully be removed, just by the nature of it, not saying everything I’ve done is worth recording, most isn’t or just repeating myself, but sometimes I find some things others don’t notice and think through things in different ways… And to be clear, not really better ways, it’s hugely inefficient and you can’t really see or make out objects, or object recognition, you still see it, but it’s broken into subcomponents, nothing whole, nothing with attached meaning, you have to stare at it and figure out what it is based on pattern, and then when you do that enough, you have that rewiring thing over time and find new pathways and stuff, you notice things mostly just use the same patterns just with differences in construction and stuff, and mutation sites that you can’t know what they do, you just know theoretically, they must exist in an optimized system like this. I’m not smarter than a lot of people, I just have advantages of Brian damage to sever whatever the fuck keeps things in loops or whatever you’d call it.

And then other stuff. There’s other stuff probably. It’s been a weird year/longer.

to the extent it matters, and it probably doesn’t, but so long as I remember what ik saying there’s something about stuff going on, so not sure how that turns out,

and people should screenshot things more, never know where this goes, keep flash drives of things, I mean, ir don’t im just assuming things based on where it seems were going.

i hadnt written this sooner, because I thought probably, and likely incorrectly, there’s a redline, and have to stay within limits, or stuff, uncertain, but kept getting mentally diverted from this choice, the reframing and overt summarization of the human middleware layer that is shared in this simulation really fucks stuff up sometimes… But what are you gonna do?

So

• (no title)
• About
• health things that might add context
• I think I can do this
• If it can do this to me it does this to everyone soon even the elites and politicians who think they are aligned
• page 2
• Page to (random stuff I can’t put off longer)… Probably, also other things will probably be discussed.
  • About me